Yes actually, cause those startups are trying to either become a large company or be bought by one. And talent moves decently well between the two kinds of companies.

This reminds me of when someone outside California asks what city someone is from and they say Palo Alto or Sunnyvale. No, that's SF.

The issue I’m referring to isn’t large companies VS small companies. I don’t think large companies are inherently bad.

I am referring to the societal harm that’s done by companies (that’s also what the article is referring to). Why is the company that’s trying to improve efficiency in the building industry being lumped together with Facebook?