| ▲ | frankzero 5 hours ago | |
I must be honest, but I have started doing the same thing to some degree. Now this is for me in particular, I do know coding, but if the task at hand will take like 3 days and Claude can write and debug it in an hour, then I usually just run it by Claude. This is not to say I don't still code, because I still do, depending on the project, but I find myself relying on Claude a lot. I know this is counterintuitive to what you want to hear, but this is my reality. However, I still know a lot of people who still code with out the use of AI. So in my opinion the profession of programming will go down as AI progresses but will never die no matter how AI advances. | ||
| ▲ | tedmiston 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
The adoption curve across companies and industries is highly variable right now. Tech moves fast but plenty of boring industries need software but don't move on the bleeding edge of tech / LLMs / etc. Even in the discourse here, you can see people getting variable quality of results and variable skepticism, some of which is valid, but a lot of it reads more like not having spent time really understanding prompt engineering. | ||