Whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams sues Meta over attempts to 'silence' her

> the company knew her termination would take away “critical employment benefits” – described as “cornerstones of her financial stability” – meaning she “had no choice” but to accept the severance agreement, allowing her to retain many of the benefits and obtain a significant cash payment.

Not that I’m siding with Facebook, but isn’t this true for basically anyone being fired?

	▲	apothegm 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes. The trouble is that to be able to not starve to death while you’re looking for a new job, you have to sign away a ton of rights, basically including the ability to sue for wrongful termination or expose wrongdoing. It’s a situation with an extremely unequal balance of power/leverage.