It's been decades since published node sizes had any connection to actual feature size. Sadly this is just how it works in the semiconductor industry now.

▲

amelius 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Who started it?

▲

lizknope 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.eejournal.com/article/no-more-nanometers/

Sometime around 2011 when Intel named their process node 22nm which the gate length was 26nm

	▲	Legend2440 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Your article says it started earlier: >So essentially, since 1997, the node name has not been a representation of any actual dimension on the chip, and it has erred in both directions by almost a factor of 2.

▲

roelmore 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Smart money would be on the first person who realized that the expertise required to understand the technical details had grown beyond that possessed by 51%+ of stock investing (trading?) population as weighted by transaction volume.