You do realize that's a politically motivated account of actions that has never been subjected to any kind of cross-examination.

I want a trial to know if this was a murder or a law enforcement action or self-defense. I should not be expected to decide PERSONALLY, I'm supposed to have a justice system that does that.

▲

conartist6 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What I heard is that she attempted to drive a way in a direction that would have made no physical contact with the officer, but the vehicle started to slip sideways on ice and travel in the direction of the officer.

If this is all true, the officer might likely be acquitted at trial, as the only necessary justification for such force is that the officer have any reason to fear for their life.

But THERE SHOULD BE A TRIAL. What I have heard from those who have studied the available forensic evidence is that Renee Good never intended to do anything but drive away, which may or may not have been legal but is not (necessarily) attempted murder, nor alone cause for an instant death penalty.

There should be a trial if for no other reason than to clear the name of Renee Good, who you are accusing of a heinous crime

	▲	felixgallo 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You don't have to 'hear' anything. If you watch the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw for example (0:55), you see that the tires are turned completely away from the murderer, who fires shots directly into her even though he is obviously not in danger of being seriously harmed.

▲

LightHugger 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲

thecrash 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's scary that you bring up the question of whether Rene Good was under arrest or not at the time she was killed. As if it were legal or justified to execute people for failing to cooperate with their own arrest. It's scary because you're not the only person who believes this - many in ICE and other police agencies hold this belief, and by repeating it you encourage them to kill again.

▲

LightHugger 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

	▲	conartist6 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah I get that. I understand that a car is really a deadly weapon, and the officer in a split second could not know for sure if the intent was to attack. But the question of whether Renee decided to do manslaughter in her last seconds is still critically important to Renee

▲

hightrix 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> violently attacking someone

Jonathan Ross is the only person in that interaction that violently attacked someone resulting in death.

▲

conartist6 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

again a legal defense would contest your claim that there was intent to attack

	▲	LightHugger 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]