|
| ▲ | galangalalgol 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Copyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation. |
| |
| ▲ | brookst 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | You wouldn’t steal a car! | | |
| ▲ | skeledrew 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Stealing a car - or anything tangible - means... the owner is very literally deprived of the benefits of owning said car/thing. Can't really say the same for a copied pattern of bits. | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | But I would download one. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | josephg 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one. Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either. |
|
| ▲ | irdc 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| So we're in violent agreement then? |
| |
