| ▲ | kelnos 3 days ago | |
> this is not really relevant to the point, but to satisfy your curiosity: more than one, and one. What? That's not only relevant to the point, it's incredibly relevant. If the NSA is only able to recruit 2% of the math PhDs they approach, then that's important information. "More than one" is not particularly useful; you seem to be dodging the question because it undermines your argument. | ||
| ▲ | john_strinlai 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
>"More than one" is not particularly useful; telling you exactly how many people i know in the NSA is also not particularly useful. i'm one guy. there is no statistically significant information from my answer. >you seem to be dodging the question because it undermines your argument. my "argument" is that there are plenty of smart people in the NSA. that's it. i am confused why that is seemingly so offensive to you that you had to reply twice. | ||