i don't understand what the second paragraph is saying.

In very crude terms, AFAICT, if you have a bunch of matrix multiplications, but one of matrices (the one with model weights) doesn't change, you can seriously speed up the computation. One thing is that you don't need to re-fetch the elements of the constant matrix, you can keep it near the ALUs. Then you maybe can detect and ignore sparse / empty blocks by marking them once.

IDK how the custom hardware exploits this; would love to hear any ideas!

▲

guyomes 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> IDK how the custom hardware exploits this; would love to hear any ideas!

You might like this article [1], titled "FPGA-based CNN Acceleration using Pattern-Aware Pruning". More context and details can be found in the PhD thesis of Léo Pradels [2].

[1]: https://inria.hal.science/hal-04689673/document

[2]: https://theses.hal.science/tel-05021575v1/file/PRADELS_Leo.p...

▲

cm2187 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Random thought. Once models stabilise, could you possibly hardcode the model in gates? Or are they too large for a single chip?

	▲	8note 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		https://www.anuragk.com/blog/posts/Taalas.html

▲

otterdude 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Basically getting around the branch predictor problem with generalized compute architectures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branch_predictor