> Wow, that is certainly going around the right-wing Christian news sites, almost all with the same copy.

Or to put it in other words, it's being ignored by all other news sites. One would think treating children as property of the state, and requiring explicit indoctrination in "tolerance and diversity", would warrant more attention from our media that is so concerned with authoritarianism.

> one of the arguments used by the judge was a statement made by one of the teenage girls [..] This is a claim made by the defense attorney in the appeal, and was not, from what I can tell, a conclusion determined by the court.

So it was not a conclusion, but the reasoning used to reach the conclusion. I don't see how that's any better.

How do you know that Western Christian outlets are reporting the story accurately?