Yes, obviously. But do we think LLMs without access to proprietary information do a better job with them than Broadcom's human experts or existing proprietary tools at this level of operations?

It is still a bold claim and it still needs evidence.

We would obviously get a bit more of the evidence if it were to be more useful for the upcoming IPO than this rather open-ended, reinterpretable phrasing.

> do a better job with them than Broadcom's human experts or existing proprietary tools

No, obviously. They'd be expected to do a substantially worse job and yet still drastically accelerate the design process.

LLMs make all sorts of dumb mistakes when writing c++ or python yet are nonetheless massively beneficial.