He was a proponent of a style of programming that was reasonable... you could reason about it and prove / demonstrate that it is doing what it should within that block of code as being correct.

Imagine teaching someone BASIC or FORTRAN...

      IF (IA .GT. 0 .AND. IB .GT. 0 .AND. IC .GT. 0) GOTO 10
        WRITE (6, 602)
  602   FORMAT (42H IA, IB, AND IC MUST BE GREATER THAN ZERO.)
        STOP 1
   10 CONTINUE

Dijkstra's approach to programming help take software development from a craft where each woodworker did things their own way and going from one shop to another meant relearning everything to something were one could more easily reason about how an application worked by removing some of the ability to write unstructured code. You can still write it... and I'm sure you can find some code that is convoluted ("... the determined Real Programmer can write FORTRAN programs in any language." https://www.ee.torontomu.ca/~elf/hack/real-programmers.html ).

Structured programming is also easier to teach. Yes, you can teach people how to write line numbered BASIC but the challenge is also teaching them discipline to not cut off their fingers when doing it. The structured programming approach it becomes easier to enforce that discipline as part of teaching ... and if they go and do dangerous things after they graduate from college, that's up to them.