>Over a decade of development and an estimated budget between $1-2 Billion, I am okay with paying ten bucks more.

I don't balance my checkbook based on what other people spend, and presuming that those things have anything to do with perceived quality is a fools' errand with the multitude of counter examples one can bring up of AAA flops.

>lesser games

this thing isn't even out yet.

how many examples of over-produced and under-delivered expensive garbage in film, media, video games & art do we need to produce until people disconnect the two concepts of quality and cost ?

edit : I used cadre the wrong way

▲

crims0n 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is Rockstar, they haven't missed in a couple of decades and this is their flagship product.

▲

jsbisviewtiful 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> they haven't missed in a couple of decades

Depends on your gaming tastes. I haven't really enjoyed any of the GTAs for longer than 2 hours, while RDR2 I also stopped playing after about 3 hours out of boredom - and similar to the GTA series, general frustrations involving the controls. Rockstar just doesn't fit my tastes, which is certainly a problem that rests with me

	▲	ethbr1 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> Depends on your gaming tastes. It doesn't, if we're talking about consensus. https://www.metacritic.com/company/rockstar-games/ That's a lot of green, and your or my opinion on any particular game isn't relevant to the assertion that Rockstar has a stellar track record in making games people seem to love.

▲

rwyinuse 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's still possible they miss this time. Unlikely, but I rather wait for reviews before buying.

	▲	stuxnet79 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It will probably be an unoptimized hot mess for the first year. Same as the rest of the over hyped AAA titles. I'm sure devs are on a death match to hit the deadline.

▲

10729287 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is it easier for you if we talk about lifetime of the game, especially online ?