Not sure if that matters much. Only the actual end result does.

The better policies given by US companies is also likely driven by competition, so by definition they wouldn't be something that a government regulation could accomplish (other than to incentivize more competition.)

▲

echoangle 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It does because for one you can go to court. If a company stops playing nice because they think you’re defrauding them if you tell them your package went missing during transit, company niceness doesn’t get you anything. (That’s a random example btw, I don’t know how this is handled legally in the US. The point is that there are situations where you actually want the law on your side).

	▲	lazyasciiart 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You don’t have to go to court even - there is usually a regulatory body that will enforce these for you. This is the whole reason why there is an image of America as sue-happy: they have chosen a regulatory system of “so sue them” instead of a functioning consumer protection system (or any authority with the ability to enforce the ADA, for example).
	▲	keiferski 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Suing people and companies is a national pastime in America. I really don't think the EU has an advantage there...