| ▲ | Zak 5 hours ago |
| > A company that starts with nothing wouldn't be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there's a good reason why those don't exist... Those do exist in other countries. An LLC in the USA does not generally need to have a certain amount of assets. Such a company is more or less without liability until it has some assets; the worst case for its owners when it comes to a routine business debt is shutting down the company. Exceptions are possible in case of serious misconduct of course. Of course a company like that will find it difficult to borrow money, but it's not rare for its last bills to go unpaid when it goes out of business. Whether those should exist or not doesn't have a clear answer. Culturally, Germans tend to be pretty uncomfortable with "sometimes shit happens and debts go unpaid", while Americans tend to find a moderate rate of that sort of thing tolerable, especially if it makes starting a new business viable for a greater fraction of the population. |
|
| ▲ | rayiner 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not quite. In the US this condition is handled at the back end. Running a corporation or LLC without sufficient capitalization can be grounds for piercing the liability shield in a lawsuit. |
| |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Running a corporation or LLC without sufficient capitalization can be grounds for piercing the liability shield in a lawsuit. Which is exactly how it should be handled, IMO: Deal with the abuse situations directly. Forcing new companies to capitalize with an arbitrary amount of money at time of founding penalizes small players who want to start a company. It's also not a hurdle at all for large players who want to commit large frauds. | | |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is the gmbh pierce proof? Because then I like the situation where if you start with $25,000 under no circumstance can they get past the liability shield. | | |
| ▲ | Sebb767 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Usually, yes. There are a few exceptions, such as serious misconduct, tax fraud and not declaring insolvency when necessary. But as long as you're following the law, you're fine. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Zak 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have the impression the situations where that actually happens are at least arguably serious misconduct, and usually targeted at someone with significant assets. A construction company that pockets ten million dollars and doesn't build anything probably can't shield its owner this way, but a single-developer software consultancy that pockets ten thousand dollars and delivers buggy code can. | | |
| ▲ | rayiner 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In theory it’s based on whether the owner of the company intended to run it under capitalized in an effort to shirk liability. | | |
| ▲ | jt2190 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But the larger point still stands: Limited liability was granted “on the front end” without the entity needing to demonstrate a minimum amount of capital. You’re only pointing out that in the U.S. that it’s possible that “on the back end” the owners of the entity might become personally liable. | | |
| ▲ | rayiner an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes, i’m just elaborating on OP’s point. The US system is different and basically more optimistic on the front end. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | nekusar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Thats cause the software and computing industry early on, disclaimed all liability. "Computers are hard, yo!". It devalues the profession. And I thought no liability was bad enough... But no. Now its LLMs and " for entertainment purposes only". I take it management and leadership also read that, and don't give one fuck. | | |
| ▲ | Zak an hour ago | parent [-] | | The ability to build reliable software has existed for a long time. Commercial airlines make heavy use of it, and serious failures are vanishingly rare. The problem is building software to those standards of reliability is expensive and slow. Consumer software never justifies it. Business software rarely does. If you want me to accept liability for the consequences of bugs in code I write, I'm giving you a schedule five times as long and a price twenty times as high. | | |
| |
| ▲ | paulsutter 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | While extreme cases are the easiest to imagine, in real life the plaintiff almost always argues to pierce the veil and the defendant always argues the opposite, and both sides earnestly believe that they are right. | | |
| ▲ | jobs_throwaway 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And in real life piercing the veil is extremely exceptional | |
| ▲ | CPLX 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah but the veil doesn’t get pierced that’s super rare, which is more important than everyone’s emotional state. |
|
| |
| ▲ | glad_duck 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Haven't heard anything about LLC capitalization in this context. Liability shield can be pierced, but only if LLC is misused (i.e. "when the company is treated as a personal "alter ego" and used to commit fraud, injustice, or illegal acts"). Lack of capitalization is not one of the reasons as long as you treat it as a company, not your wallet. | |
| ▲ | gunapologist99 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Have to prove fraud to get there. "Under" capitalization is a judgment call. Effectively, it's very rare. An LLC launches with effectively zero dollars literally dozens of times a day. | |
| ▲ | woah an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is a core difference between common law and civil law. In common law systems, things tend to get sorted out after the fact, with a judge's discretion, only if things go really wrong. In civil law systems they try to design a perfect system of laws that makes problems impossible. |
|
|
| ▲ | ghaff 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I set up an LLC in the US for about $500 and pay Delaware a few hundred each year in fees. As it turned out, it was probably an unnecessary exercise and I probably won't renew in a couple years. But it wasn't a big deal. |
| |
| ▲ | WinstonSmith84 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Delaware is expensive and you must have had a very specific reason to build your LLC there, rather than for example in Wyoming - such that to raise capital, build a corporation, etc. Now if you want to shut it down in a couple of years, it's not exactly clear what you had in mind. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | fl0id an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's other types of companies. Like UG or freelancers or GbR. |
|
| ▲ | asyx 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We have an UG for that. A GmbH is simply the wrong legal form for that sort of thing. You can create an UG with a single Euro on the bank account (and then immediately go bankrupt once you need to pay the notary). |
| |
| ▲ | miroljub 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No we don't. UG is still a GmbH bureaucratic monster which a bit less start capital. You still need to follow all taxation rules like GmbH, which costs you few more thousands per year (Bilanzeirung, Steuerberater, Abschluss, ...) just to be legaly compliant. American LLC taxation is as simple as or even simpler than Anlage EÜR. And you don't need a tax advisor to do it. | |
| ▲ | thomas_witt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A UG and and a GmbH is legal-wise exactly the same. | |
| ▲ | slopinthebag 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | OP’s point is that you don’t need money in the bank to open an LLC like you would in Germany. | | |
| ▲ | fl0id 43 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You don't need money for the UG either. You might need money for operating expenses later etc, but that's not what OP complained about and should be similar for an LLC. (Depending on type of business, location etc) |
|
|
|
| ▲ | coffeebeqn 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > sometimes shit happens and debts go unpaid What’s wild is that this is pre-debt. The banks will have their own risk math for you so it’ll be a completely separate set of hoops before you get to be in debt as a company. Most will not even talk to you if you have 0€ in the business account. I don’t feel like a company with no assets or income can do that much damage to their societies. Also as a small company in the EU I have to have liability insurance for the company for any major clients so the insurance company also will make you jump through further hoops. |
| |
| ▲ | marcosdumay 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I don’t feel like a company with no assets or income can do that much damage to their societies. Keep in mind that those companies will almost always own some debit to their employees when they blow up. IMO, $25k is a ridiculous amount of capital to require from a company before they can operate. But capital requirements are good, and they should be proportional to employment, not company existence. | | |
| ▲ | j45 an hour ago | parent [-] | | It seems anchored in the risks of the past vs the possibilities of today. |
| |
| ▲ | wavemode 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are ways to go into debt without dealing with banks. Any time you use something and are charged afterwards, it's a debt (which you could fail to pay by being broke by the time the invoice arrives). Common example - rent/lease. Or gas/electricity. | | |
| ▲ | nradov 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Those vendors can always require payment in advance, or a guarantor. | |
| ▲ | plagiarist 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | For a new business with $0 the individual running it will be the guarantor on those. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | sam_lowry_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |