| ▲ | giancarlostoro 5 hours ago | |||||||
I'm not interested in people's take on SpaceX this early after their IPO, they have an ambitious vision and Elon Musk gets a lot of blind hatred. You don't invest into SpaceX to see returns in a month, you're in it for the next five or more years or you're better off finding a different stock to invest in. To date SpaceX is the top leader in getting things into space for the lowest cost, everyone else pales in comparison. | ||||||||
| ▲ | epistasis 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
People don't invest in SpaceX because of space launch capability, that barely counts for their valuation at all. The valuation of SpaceX is due to AI, namely the revenue they get for renting out their GPUs to companies that actually have AI customers, as their own AI tech has not panned out. For the large number of companies rolled into SpaceX, they are all failed attempts to grow large enough to justify their valuations, and when a company fails to do that it just gets rolled into the conglomerate as a way of hiding the failure. Tesla's valuation contrasted with its performance means that Tesla will likely be rolled into whatever latest vehicle of Musk's has the most attention, hiding the failure of Tesla to come anywhere near to its promises. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | dtj1123 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Other than launching satellites, being able to get things into space for the lowest cost is about as relevant as being able to get things to the bottom of the ocean for the lowest cost. It's never going to be cost effective to send anything back down the gravity well, which means that the only way Musk's plan leads anywhere is if he's able to bootstrap an entirely self contained, self perpetrating economy in space. That's not happening in five years. Edit: and no, data centres in space are not the answer. | ||||||||
| ▲ | efdee 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
In that case you'd be better off waiting 6 to 12 months before buying into SPCX. | ||||||||
| ▲ | spacington 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Space-x is it's biggest customer. Star Link is the main thing which increased the payload to space significantly. Star Link only has 10 million customers and every few minutes a satellite handover is happening which makes it hard to use for video call (was my experience at a friend's house) While this business is paying of right now others will get into it too and destroying SpaceX margin (china etc) Now what else on payload is there? Ah yes Datacenter. It would take 300-400 Sparship launches alone to get a current 200-300Mwh DC into space alone. Starship doesn't deliver yet what it needs to be able to do. Neither on payload side nor on cost reduction due to reuse. A DC will be cheaper on earth for a long time as long as earth is as empty as it is especially for areas which are just dessert. It would be a lot better long term investment to just build its own Datacenter city in the dessert as ai doesn't need that low of latency and use everything realtime in the other Datacenter we already have. SpaceX Elon musk fantasy is 50-100 years to early. You gonna wait so long? | ||||||||
| ||||||||