> Which leaves the only real question. Why 25,000 at all? It is my company and my risk. If I want to start with nothing, that is my call, not a toll the state collects before it will let me try.

> And the cheap door has a price of its own: to some clients, “UG” reads as “not serious,” and they would rather deal with a GmbH

The post itself explains exactly why the first complaint is a fallacy and the second one is true:

> The simplest setup is a sole proprietorship [...] also makes me personally liable for everything. A client sues? They are not suing a company. They are suing me. My savings, my apartment, my name.

> So I wanted real limited liability, which means a company.

The liabilities of a limited-liability company aren't your risk.

The people who stand to lose out if your company folds are not you but your customers, creditors and anyone else with a claim to more than the company can repay.

The more capital it has, the less likely it is to collapse while having more liabilities than assets.

▲

phlsa 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, I found that part odd too.

Also, you can found a GmbH and only pay in 50% of the €25k. My understanding is that you're still personally liable for the rest, but it lowers the hurdle to founding a GmbH at least somewhat.

▲

nradov 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If a company collapses while having more liabilities than assets then that's fine. No one is being forced to extend any credit to them.

▲

zymhan 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It will make it harder for "worthy" companies to get loans and credit.

	▲	nradov a minute ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Nah. Lenders are free to do whatever credit checks they like. Government doesn't need to get involved.
	▲	woah an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Is that why it's so hard to get capital, credit, loans, and investment in the USA?

▲

hypendev 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That system is silly.

I can open a company, work for a year, acrue debt, acrue tax debt, close it.

Nothing will happen. Company "estate" will be sold to cover the debt, which can also be nothing.

▲

JanSt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, if you don't handle this correctly you become personally liable

▲

jojomodding 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

Probably criminally liable for bankruptcy as well. At least in Germany (where I am vaguely familiar with the law) you lose bankruptcy protection for debts you take on that are knowingly not covered by existing assets or expected future income. This is usually hard to prove, but if your assets are 0 and there was never a viable plan all along they'll likely found you guilty. This means you become personally liable to the creditors and might also face jail time.

	▲	ccozan 28 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		In Germany yes, the law is pretty tough: you need to think _every_ day this "Will I be able to pay anything I have to pay with a horizon of 12 months?" If in one day answer is NO, you have to immediatelly go and register insolvency. If you do not do it, big issue, and possible jail time.

▲

wagwang an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's what bank underwriting is for and you will quickly find that your 0 income 0 asset llc would have difficulty borrowing.

▲

throw1234567891 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

notanormalnerd 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, he has no clue and complains about having no clue.

He wants a company but not put down any assets, but still limited liability, he has to get a UG. But obviously customers don't want to deal with that because there are no assets in case they pay 5.000€ and the company goes belly up.

Customers deal with GmbH, because they know they have at least a little bit of value in assets. So if I buy from you for 5.000€ I know that should be covered by your assets.

The guy is an idiot and has been misconsulted by the law firm and has been pulled over the table by said law firm.

	▲	ekelsen 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's not how it works in most other countries and it seems fine?