| ▲ | bluenose69 12 hours ago | |||||||
The curve on your diagram makes me think that you've fitted a normal (Gaussian) curve to the data. By eye, the distribution looks a bit more like log-normal, and so if you're still working on the data, you might want to try that to see. Not that anything you've said or concluded seems wrong, though. | ||||||||
| ▲ | andruby 12 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The normal curve in the image is there for operators to visually check if the machine results are normal distributed or not. It's a "stencil", not data. The software actually does a Lilliefors normality test which returns a big No on this data. | ||||||||
| ||||||||