| ▲ | ThreatSystems 3 hours ago | |
In agreement with frodd above. Dependencies and supply chain attacks are probably the greatest risk to a lot of software orgs, as they run them across all their environments: Development (with secrets and other valuable artefacts on developer VMs), CI/CD pipelines which may have access tokens to production (and other) environments, and production itself. Notably even security companies are being impacted by this[0]. The scale of these attacks has amplified quite significantly the past three years, but are not solely exclusive to the javascript ecosystem [1] or even just namesquatting/typosquatting [2]. The resolution is broader security awareness, "onion layered" security controls and implementing simple non-burden inducing processes and policies. Sometimes not updating (what was wrong with the previous version of a dependency if there was no immediate vulnerability or production issue caused by it?) or having a two week cool down for updates (which some supply chain tooling natively supports) can appease some security functions through clear communication of the supply chain risk etc. If anyone has interest in courses aligned to your org on improving developer and broader engineering management awareness on this, e-mails in my profile :). [0] - https://socket.dev/blog/ongoing-supply-chain-attack-targets-... [1] - https://orca.security/resources/blog/hades-pypi-supply-chain... [2] - https://checkmarx.com/zero-post/python-pypi-supply-chain-att... | ||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||