| ▲ | Ten years on, Brexit's economic impact is becoming clearer(bbc.co.uk) | |||||||
| 17 points by mellosouls 10 hours ago | 5 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | ternaryoperator 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
What the Brexit vote demonstrated IMHO is that you should not make profound systemic changes based on 50% + 1 vote. You really need a super-majority, otherwise the country is at the mercy of any campaign or latest fashion. This vote is not like electing a new PM, as it caused changes that will ripple across generations and dozens of PMs. Such changes should require a true mandate--which Brexit's 51.9% was not. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | dlcarrier 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
From the article:
To clarify the title, the impact of Brexit is dwarfed by events that have happened sense, to the point that it is difficult to make any judgments. As time goes on, it makes working with statistics a little easier, but it's still far from clear.Here's the only thing I found that really stands out:
It looks like there's more growth in non-EU trade than EU trade. If that occurred in concert with fluctuations in exchange rate, that could show a UK/EU economic imbalance, but considering that exchange rate stayed pretty flat, especially compared to the swings after the 2009 financial crisis, it looks like the post-Brexit economics between the UK and the EU stayed closer in sync than they did pre-Brexit. | ||||||||
| ▲ | 1970-01-01 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
9 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13985192 | ||||||||
| ▲ | ChrisArchitect 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Earlier: Scars mark Britain's economy 10 years after Brexit vote | ||||||||