Based on the fact that Claude Opus 4.8 decided I needed a cybersecurity exemption to debug a stupid pure virtual call bug (basically virtual method called inside of destructor) that I had already found, oh boy, I sure would love to have my 3D prints analyzed by Anthropic safe guards. We should also ensure that nothing shaped like a dildo can be printed without scanning our face and genitalia and keeping it on file with Persona while we're at it.

I'm not mad at you for suggesting this, you're right, I'm just generally aimlessly angry and ready for this world to burn.

▲

caturopath a day ago | parent | next [-]

I'm getting a lot of refusals these days from multiple LLMs on multiple fronts for silly stuff, a lot more than I had for a while. If this is where things are really going, I think open weight models have a big future.

▲

a day ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

jojobas a day ago | parent | prev [-]

"H.R. 148867 makes all large language models subject to safety certification, introduces penalties for unlicensed training and use of uncertified models"

▲

bluescrn a day ago | parent | next [-]

And China wins the AI race

▲

jojobas a day ago | parent [-]

Who cares of the races when CHILDREN are at stake!

	▲	jchw a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Hey, let's be fair, a number of politicians and ultra rich psychopaths care a lot about children, it was covered in those documents...
	▲	verdverm a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The politicians still care about their races?

▲

parineum a day ago | parent | prev [-]

So many ridiculous bills get introduced in the house you can find one that says anything.

▲

jojobas a day ago | parent [-]

You didn't think this one was real, or did you?

	▲	parineum a day ago \| parent [-]
		I don't doubt that it is but I didn't check. The point is that you can probably find a HR to propose allowing aliens to land in the grand canyon. The existence of a house resolution mean that one representative wrote a thing, not that it's on the precipice of becoming law.

▲

cladopa a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Frankly who cares about dildos when your personal freedom and private property of you and your family is at stake.You can buy uncountable dildo models in a shop.

I recently was in Venezuela, I have been in Cuba. I am a native spaniard. There you have a group of people that took control of the weapons in the country and uses it to basically enslave the rest of the country.

When the people in power have automatic weapons and you don't there is basically nothing you can do to defend yourself from the abuses of power.

That is a real thing the people in power have wet dreams and would love to do in any country, including the US.

	▲	DivingForGold a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Ummm, well, seems in historical perspective that quite a few instances of rebels using improvised molotov cocktails against tyrannical governments. When it's a country that the US disapproves of, seems they support this activity as "freedom fighters". But when this behavior occurs in protests inside the homeland, obviously the authorities come down hard.
	▲	blks 18 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		USA seems to have a lot of automatic guns, but still succumbs to authoritarism and masked goons terrorising population.
	▲	jchw 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Frankly who cares about [sex stuff] when ... Don't ask me. I think the focus on sex things is utterly insane. However, even on Hacker News many people definitely seem extremely concerned at least about people under 18 having access to Internet pornography, which to me, clearly isn't even remotely close to the biggest problem adolescents are facing. In America we're worried about 3D printed ghost guns. Why? Ostensibly it's because ghost guns are showing up more at crime scenes, since 3D printing is just so accessible these days. How many gun deaths do 3D printed guns currently account for? As far as I know, something on the order of magnitude of around 0.01%, at least in America. That number is probably mostly small because we never actually really did anything about regular gun violence. This is not a new pattern. Nuclear energy has very few fatalities in its track record. Shockingly few when you consider its reputation. Depending on how you count it, it is pretty much a rounding error by any reasonable measure. Meanwhile, we send at least somewhere around 10,000 bodies to the morgue every year as a result of pollution from natural gas power plants. How many from nuclear? Probably less than one on average. Certainly nowhere near 10,000 no matter how you shake it, twist it or bend it. Even the dumbest and least reputable studies couldn't force the number to half as high, which is pretty funny to me. Is nuclear fission still the future? Given the density and reliability of energy production from fission it's hard to entirely count it out even in a mostly solar + battery future... yet here we are, with politicians arguing about the safety of ~0 deaths per year energy production method vs >10,000 deaths per year energy production method. Does it matter that politicians are so interested in regulating sex when bigger issues are at stake? Well, yeah. It's no less alarming even if it seems trivial. Not everyone has to pick every battle, but to me free expression is my bugbear so I give a fuck when it's in the mouths of politicians. The apparatus for suppressing expression never stops where it starts. Never. It wouldn't be right if it did, but the point of trying to come up with something that sounds like an obvious net good is that it can make people more forgiving to implement a terrible idea and set an awful precedent. Which, of course, is why it's pretty likely in the near future you will need a driver's license to reply to this comment. Somehow, it started with Internet pornography.