| ▲ | asdff a day ago | |||||||
Prop 13 only sees statewide median homeownership period go up slightly in california compared to national average. The real issue is not these edge cases that prop 13 might bring about, but zoning. Have a look at this graph: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-p... You can see how even with prop 13, even with various RSO ordinances, even with red tape, even with building code requirements, the demand for development has always been enough to build to the limits of what has been allowed through zoning, ever since cities like LA were widely downzoned in response to redlining being made illegal in the early 1970s and succeeding zoning plans. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pchristensen a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Porque no los dos? Zoning limits what and how much is permitted. Prop 13 changes the economics and greatly reduces churn and supply, both for redevelopment and migration. Prop 13 takes the normal supply problems introduced by zoning and turbocharges them. | ||||||||
| ||||||||