The European Union passed The Artificial Intelligence Act, which classifies:

High-risk – AI applications that are expected to pose significant threats to health, safety, or the fundamental rights of persons. Notably, AI systems used in health, education, recruitment, critical infrastructure management, law enforcement or justice. They are subject to quality, transparency, human oversight and safety obligations

That's a pretty common sense legislation to me.

▲

anon373839 a day ago | parent | next [-]

The AI “safety” industry is lobbying for federal preemption so that states won’t have the power to enact these types of sensible regulations.

▲

pc86 a day ago | parent [-]

> > European

	▲	anon373839 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Right, I'm saying that these are sensible regulations and Anthropic et al want to prevent US states from being able to pursue them.

▲

pc86 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is one of those things where the first sentence sounds completely fine and reasonable, maybe even objectively good.

Of all the things listed "recruitment" doesn't belong to me. Is the argument that it is someone's fundamental human right to get someone else to pay them to do a job? Or is it strictly about human oversight?

	▲	tadfisher 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Friend, we are discussing a demonstration of systemic bias in hiring decisions made by AI models. The argument is that it is someone's fundamental right to be treated the same as someone else with the same qualifications but different skin color.

▲

tbrownaw a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> That's a pretty common sense legislation to me.

There's no reason to single out AI vs any other approach to the same topics.

▲

72027372920 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]