I don't see any real point being made in (or point of) the article. The author sort of just...dumped a bunch of links with the noise that is so incredibly mainstream at the moment that I doubt any of it is news to anyone even somewhat tracking the AI cycle. Most of it (except for maybe the BLS[1] stat) is just regurgitation.

[1]: And this too is incorrect, should be " the number of jobs displaced would be around 32.5M" (the post says 32.5K)