| ▲ | Catloafdev 5 hours ago | |
Affordability is not the current goal. Vendor lock-in is the current goal. Consumer prices are a drop in the bucket comparatively. | ||
| ▲ | woeirua 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
How can you lock in when the harnesses are basically thin clients around the APIs and you can replicate them using agents in a short period of time? I haven't seen a compelling thesis yet for how you achieve vendor lock in for LLMs. Claude Code is a bit sticky, but if we're being honest its just because Codex doesn't have all the same features yet. | ||
| ▲ | dofm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Luckily the industry is much too wise, after a couple of decades of cloud infrastructure, to willingly opt to make itself entirely dependent on one of two platforms with opaque and complicated pricing. We've learned our lessons, oh yes | ||
| ▲ | rconti 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Maybe they just need the competition to run out of funding first? | ||
| ▲ | hk__2 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That’s an impossible goal; it’s too easy to switch models. | ||
| ▲ | downrightmike 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
And Microsoft forced M365 subscriptions to include AI for +$30/license. Cheap, but gave them a massive user base they can claim is using AI | ||