| ▲ | sneak 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This isn’t about kids at all. The ID requirement is the WHOLE POINT. That it is technically possible to do age verification in a privacy-preserving way is thus entirely irrelevant. They want all online activity tied to ID so they can violently, illegally retaliate in the dark of night against protected expression online that they don’t like. That’s all this is. Privacy-preserving techniques are irrelevant because they do not accomplish this goal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | encom an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My government shouldn't decide what content I'm viewing or providing, and that's the end of it. >muh kids That's the parents problem, not mine. Any system the government comes up with will be insecure, inconvenient, invasive and cost the taxpayers billions, and you all know it's true. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | inigyou 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is also, separately from that, a need to protect kids from growing up into the people in Idiocracy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||