| ▲ | phoe-krk 2 days ago |
| Possible context at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis... - might be a better link, too. |
|
| ▲ | account42 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Seems to be a place full of pleasant people. |
|
| ▲ | FergusArgyll 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah I wasn't sure which to post. Maybe dang can put that link in the description... |
| |
| ▲ | OJFord 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Fwiw in future - you can do that too on submission. URL and description are not either-or. | | |
| ▲ | FergusArgyll 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Oh I thought that was only possible in [ask, tell, show]hn. Thanks! | | |
| ▲ | OJFord 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Yeah it's an interesting object lesson in design or user behaviour or something – I notice this come up relatively often – I think because it's rarely used, or almost exclusively in certain circumstances as you say, people infer a stricter rule/possibility than anything it actually says ('If there is a url, text is optional.'). |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | SanjayMehta a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Meatpuppetry? Bludgeoning? They've created their own lexicon and priesthood to run it. No wonder it's so badly compromised. Larry is right. |