| ▲ | tancop 16 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
the key word is consumer product. apps can (and should) set their own rules but models need to stay neutral and capable of producing harmful content. they should never generate it unless asked to by the user but its important that the capability is there and users/app developers can turn off all guardrails if they want to. open source gives you a guarantee that if one version drops without censorship you can keep using it forever even if its replaced by a censored one on the api. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | foldr 16 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think you’re overestimating the market for such models. Most people don’t want a model that’s prone to generating extremely offensive output. If you want something “uncensored”, then open source models already exist, as you say. But the model itself has already been extensively tuned to produce desired outputs and not produce undesired outputs, so it doesn’t really make sense to distinguish “uncensored” raw models from “censored” apps or harnesses. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||