| ▲ | coldtea 16 hours ago | |
>By acknowledging that nobody considers these objective truths, there’s nothing interesting to say on the topic On the contrary, that's where most interesting things to say happen in the real social world. From relationships all the way to wars. >You were playing around with the linguistic ambiguity for whatever reason using a different definition than was used by “There is only a single source of truth and that is objective reality.” and I called you out on it. Nope, you were limited by the one definition you had in mind, unable to understand that real world, real people, don't constraint themselves to it, and argue regarding the truth or falsehood in all kinds of things that are not bound to "objective reality". In other words, you pedantically erased most of human life and discource on the truth (not to mention the incovenient other philosophical and dictionary definitions of it) with "well, ahchtually". | ||
| ▲ | Retric 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> you were limited by the one definition you had in mind Intentionally misunderstanding what someone said is at best wordplay, and wordplay is fucking boring. Stop being boring. | ||