| ▲ | MrOrelliOReilly 4 hours ago | |
I'm not sure I follow your logic. Paying for a service does not mean you get access to all potential services a provider offers. Providers can choose to keep some services internal. Silly example: I pay Netflix for their most basic plan, so I get ads. Just because I already pay them money, doesn't mean I have a right to no ads! It also doesn't mean I have a right to 8k streaming; maybe Netflix reserves that for their internal cinema. | ||
| ▲ | NichoPaolucci an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Both companies offer "MAX" or "PRO" plans - and the best models were available to those customers. This new wave of "It's too dangerous for the public" is a new initiative from both companies. I agree with your overall sentiment. Paying for "Claude Mini" doesn't get you "Claude Maximos". However, the overall precedent that the companies have set is that if you pay for the top tier subscription, you get the top tier model. That's not true any more. | ||
| ▲ | dgellow 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
You have the right to complain and ask for more though | ||
| ▲ | Intermernet an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
When Netflix launched, you got the service without ads. That has changed. That's what's known as a rug-pull. | ||