Its for reasoning not generating art?

Can you explain this a bit more

Imagine you want to make a smaller model that is really good at one thing, say, driving a car. You could remove the parameters that lead it to correctly answer, "What is the powerhouse of the cell?" or, "Who was the first president of the United States?"

It would look really dumb if someone asked it that, but that's fine. You're trying to make a model that is optimized for efficiency for a specific task. As much as possible, you should prune uncorrelated things.

▲

pylotlight 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

SVG generation is a useless test, what's there more to know?

▲

steve_adams_86 8 hours ago | parent [-]

What if you're reasoning about how to generate SVG correctly?

	▲	Mtinie 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In this case, I’d expect it should make a web search tool call to find the Python library best suited for SVG generation and manipulation, and then use what it learns there to execute the task you’ve asked it to do (either asking if you’d like to incorporate the library as a dependency or to roll its own implementation of a subset of the features if that was your preference), Assuming tool calling hasn’t been entirely stripped out of this model. (Edit) No tool calling, per this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640189