Oh God I'm tired of ai written thought pieces

I see this comment frequently in this site and it doesn't provide any value. If this isn't part of the hackernews rules, I hope it becomes one soon.

▲

newfocogi 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t think LLMs would write this:

“Anyways, Redis homepage aside, you deploy it, and off you go - your trusty cache. You hand the connection string to the people who asked for it, and off you go.”

▲

abofh 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

So many it's not X it's Y. It might have been polished, but it was claude

▲

newfocogi 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Or this:

“None of these things are impossible with Redis, it’s just that memcached’s architecture in general more leans towards these directions, which makes it much, much more straightforward from an operations point of view.”

	▲	chipotle_coyote 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's become de rigueur on HN to accuse any article one thinks is trite, obvious, or simply disagreeable of being AI-written. ("That comment has three items in a list! No human would ever put three items in a list! Checkmate, bot!")

▲

poly2it 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't see how this is AI-written?

▲

throw310822 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Somebody call Deckard.