| ▲ | owlninja 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
I read a book this year about sports gambling in the US [1], and it points out how nasty and predatory it is. I think "prediction markets" have even less regulation? I would talk to my sports fan buddies at work and they would say "oh, just how sportsbooks in Vegas operate already", but this is on-demand, in your face, constantly nudging you to bet with dark patterns and "comps". I used to want sports gambling legal in the US, but the way it has gone is incredibly disgusting and is starting to make watching sports almost annoying. The crawl on the bottom is no longer scores, but moneylines... [1] "Everybody Loses: The Tumultuous Rise of American Sports Gambling" (2026) by Danny Funt | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | somenameforme 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
A bit of a tangent, but many like the moneylines isn't because of gambling but because it tells you who's the favorite/underdog and by what margin. It's like in the equivalent of a chess game of knowing the player's ratings, which itself can directly lead to a nominal moneyline, but in most sports there's no formal predictive rating system. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TZubiri an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
Predictions markets are more regulated than sports betting, because the events being predicted are wider, so they will naturally touch on a whole lot more regulation. For example, can someone place a bet on an event that X person will be shot? That question now touches on a whole range of laws regarding murder, life insurance, incitation to violence, free speech? That you just don't touch at all in sports betting. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||