| ▲ | margalabargala 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
I may be able to help with that bewilderment. Imagine, you have two people. Person A knows cursive, person B does not. Person B knows the ins and outs of Newtonian physics, person A does not. Which person is smarter? Which person would the cursive test say is smarter? What you seem to have mistook for people not knowing things without shame, is people valuing knowledge not by the preponderance of its quantity but by its total when multiplied by its utility. Otherwise I do not envy the shame you must feel at lacking the knowledge of which plants are edible, how to.clean a carcass, how to fashion a needle from bone and an axe from stone, the mixture of clays to use to make your bricks, and all manner of other once-necessary tidbits whose usefulness has lapsed for the general population. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | reaperducer 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
The person who knows cursive can go on to learn Newtonian physics. Now he knows two things. While your supposed hero still only knows one. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||