Don't misrepresent what others say. The 4th amendment should not be violated. I can only interpret your response as "the 4th amendment should be violated".

▲

assimpleaspossi 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Then you would be wrong. I'm pointing out the internet's liberal obsession with anti-police and, seemingly, pro-criminal activity. The internet likes to find fault with the police while dismissing or ignoring criminal activity. It's a horror I cannot understand. It's pure insanity.

▲

willis936 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Okay, then pontificate that as a top level comment. Responding to someone saying the 4th amendment should not be circumvented with a refute is a statement about the 4th amendment, not some imagined counter party.

▲

assimpleaspossi 6 hours ago | parent [-]

This whole thread represents the imaginary of the internet and it makes me sick. I have to get off the internet. I've spent too much time with it lately.

	▲	bobthebob 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I’m right here with you. This is a genuinely cool useful technology that helps solve crimes and all we get is pearl clutching. Most people don’t give AF