| ▲ | debugnik a day ago | |
An open source kernel doesn't prevent attestation mechanisms. Anticheats on Windows increasingly require Secure Boot, and all others drivers to be signed/whitelisted; they could try to put similar restrictions on supported distros. | ||
| ▲ | B-Con 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yeah, I imagine Linux support would be more like a supported Linux distro rather than generic Linux support. Something like SteamOS but with kernel anti-cheat and secure boot from the start. Big question is whether they can make craching the anti-cheat it hard/unpredictable enough that the publishers will trust it. If the publishers release such a platform and someone releases a live distro that can crack it with 3 mouse clicks, that's a lot of wasted effort. I have no idea how effective the Windows anti-cheat is, but I imagine that Linux tooling in general is going to make it harder to lock a user out of controlling their own machine. | ||
| ▲ | frollogaston 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
In fact Android has secure boot plus its own stricter thing. Probably the most commonly running software based on the Linux kernel. | ||
| ▲ | cwillu a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah, the nightmare scenario. I'm actually a little bit worried that we will look back on the last few years as the Golden Years of Gaming on Linux | ||