> We think these are related, just like you do.

Oh, we're all well aware that you think hurting people is the only way to improve the country.

> The difference is that you assume that hurting billionaires will improve America while we assume that hurting NGOs and postmodernist academics will do so.

Don't you know that lying is a sin? You can't even define "postmodernist". No. I've heard this screeching noise you're making many times but it always boils down to the same truth: you don't believe in hurting "postmodernist academics", you believe in hurting people who aren't straight, white, christians.

▲

rayiner a day ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

solid_fuel a day ago | parent [-]

> How about “people who bring intersectional personal attributes into a discussion of science funding?”

Yeah, that's what I figured - you are in fact completely incapable of defining "postmodernist". I don't think anyone is surprised that you have no idea what you're talking about though, it's pretty obvious that you're just a really emotionally fragile guy who is having some big feelings about minorities existing.

By the way, I know there's no god, because if there was you would have spontaneously imploded from the sheer irony of whining about bringing “intersectional personal attributes into a discussion of science funding” in a post-DOGE world.

▲

TimorousBestie a day ago | parent [-]

“By that definition, DOGE was postmodernist” is sincerely great, good job.

	▲	solid_fuel a day ago \| parent [-]
		0/10 on reading comprehension, repeat 5th grade. I'm sure that's not the first time you've been told that.