| ▲ | throwaw12 a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> If his monetary value to the company was as said why would any other metric like complexity even remotely matter Here is why: I turned off a feature flag in our feature flagging service which saved company 10% infra cost, do you think I can be promoted to Staff+ and lead 50 engineers? Promotions and/or recognitions in corporate environments works differently. I don't agree with it, but this is how it works: If what you did feels simple, anyone else can do it as well, why should we promote you for finding such silly mistake or improvement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BobbyTables2 a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same with executives and upper management. One cannot be a director/VP of 3 people. They need an empire… | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sivalus 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Models of extra compensation works elsewhere, like commissions and base salaries. I would think we could come up with something for engineers and ops in return for saving the company money that doesn't result in exploitative behavior. There is just no collective bargaining power to put it into effect. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hansvm 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> staff+ Maybe. It looking easy isn't the point. If you have the knowledge and skills such that doing so is a semi-repeatable endeavor, especially in a world where your colleagues apparently missed that 10% savings lying on the floor, is that not (part of) the point of a promotion? [0] > lead 50 engineers That's a totally separate ballgame. Nothing in your example says anything about leadership ability. Maybe you have those skills, and maybe you don't, but technical acumen is separate from leadership. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||