| ▲ | naturalmovement 9 hours ago | |
Because they were the only party competent enough to run a PKI (which is 95% policy) while Linux distros still can't agree on a single boot loader. shim didn't exist at first. Linux was planning to go without until Red Hat's hand was forced likely because their paying customers demanded it. | ||
| ▲ | mjg59 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
It's actually largely because I demanded it, our customers weren't paying attention at all - Fedora was going to be hit much worse than RHEL | ||