I have about 500 games in my Steam library and maaaybe 20% of them are available for the PS5 (which I own).

And I've paid full retail price for maybe two of them, the vast majority is from 50-90% sales. You don't get those for the PS5 that much.

I also don't have any need for a "Gaming PC", what I've always wanted is a console but with my Steam games. This is it.

▲

protimewaster a day ago | parent | next [-]

Games at a certain point in their life are cheaper on console. At least, physically. I remember being shocked at this years ago, because I expected PC to be cheapest. But, a few years back, I went through and looked up a bunch of AAA games that were about 6 months old, and a lot of them were cheaper to buy physical, on console, from Amazon or another retailer. Cheaper than they'd ever been available for on PC, according to IsThereAnyDeal.

I think it's partly because, on console, the sellers / devs have an incentive to reduce the price of physical copies, because they need to compete with used copies. They killed used copies on PC, so they don't need to compete with that market.

	▲	izacus a day ago \| parent [-]
		Physical games are on the way out for consoles and the proces quotes for PlayStations are the models without the drive.

▲

r0fl 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How do you find time to play 500 games?

Even if a game takes 5 hours that’s 2500 hours

That’s mind blowing to me

	▲	Tangurena2 11 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I have a huge number also. And I've played a small fraction. For example, Stellaris - I've got almost 900 hours played. Against The Storm is running a close second. Some other games, less than an hour. If it is 99 cents, I'm probably going to get it if it looks somewhat similar to anything I enjoy. If you check out Humble Bundle, you can find bundles of games where you get 20-30 games for around $20. Many of them are charity bundles, like one I got to help people in the Turkey/Syria area affected by the 2023 earthquake. Those bundles mostly consist of keys redeemed on the Steam platform. I don't play first-person-shooters, so those are going to sit in my library unplayed & uninstalled.
	▲	vel0city 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Let's say you on average manage to find 8 hours a week in a normal week playing videogames. A decent bit, no doubt, but not too crazy for someone who would consider themselves a "gamer". You do that like 50 weeks a year. That's ~400 hours a year. 2,500 / 400 = 6.25 years. My Steam account is 20 years old. Even if we doubled it to 5,000 hours, that's 250 hours a year. Roughly 5 hours a week on average. That said, a lot of people just end up owning a lot of games on Steam through sales even though they may never play them or only put a few hours in them. I've got >200 games and yet over half have <2 hours of play time. A ton I've never installed, they just came bundled in sales with other games I did actually want. When you can buy a whole publisher's collection of games for like $20 on some crazy sale why not?

▲

aNapierkowski a day ago | parent | prev [-]

yeah i wonder if SteamOS gets a more official generic release or if it stays pointed at Steamdeck and Steam machine directly the only differences between this and a "Gaming PC" are the OS & tiny form factor (which are both quite relevant)

but youre exactly the target market for this it sounds like

I think you could kind of get there with a gaming pc that boots up steam big picture immediately? but it would feel hacky vs this for sure