your bank owns your money?

AlotOfReading a day ago | parent | next [-]

It's the norm in the US (and pretty much everywhere else with well-implemented developed financial infrastructure) for banks to apply extra scrutiny and roadblocks to large withdrawals. There's a patio11 article going over some of the reasons [0], but it notably generates paperwork for the bank reporting the withdrawal to the government and enables a lot of fraud to allow immediate access.

[0] https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/two-americas-one-bank...

▲

asimovDev a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

yes, I have to apply in advance if I want to withdraw large amounts of cash and it has to be approved.

▲

jazzyjackson a day ago | parent | next [-]

This is more 'multi-factor authentication' than deciding what you can spend your money on

▲

FireBeyond a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> I have to apply in advance

Banks try to avoid holding excessive amounts of cash in suburban branches because it makes them attractive armed robbery targets. If you have a need for a large amount of cash, you can let them know (my bank says 24-48 hours in advance), go to multiple branches, or to a large city branch. Inconvenient, perhaps, though temporary. If it's for a business or a recurring need your bank is generally happy to make that part of their regular logistics, "Monday's cash delivery needs X because asimovDev regularly wants $50,000 in cash every Wednesday".

> it has to be approved

I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I don't think it's "approved" in the sense of the bank deciding if you're allowed to do so. But hmm: multiple ID checks, or a specific seniority of bank employee doing the check. Or if you decide you want to take out $250,000 and you have to do it in cash, they might a) want a day or two to physically acquire the cash, and/or b) have additional security due to their insurance policy. They certainly might try to suggest you look at a cashier's check or wire transfer or other instrument to do so. There's going to be a CAR for any transaction involving more than $10,000 in cash.

But I'd challenge the assertion that the bank tells you you're "not allowed" to withdraw "large amounts of cash" from an otherwise unencumbered bank account.

	▲	asimovDev a day ago \| parent [-]
		Last time I needed a couple thousand in cash, I had to fill out a paper form stating what I will do with the money. One time I told them "I will party in my home country" and they denied

▲

PaulDavisThe1st a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Think of it less as "the bank owns your money" and more "the government likes to watch large cash flows moving around".

	▲	trollbridge 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Also, "the bank likes to make sure elderly people are not being scammed/abused", which is a common problem when someone suddenly wants to take all their cash out. The bank indeed has a duty to advise its clients if a wire transfer, etc. might be a more suitable way to do what they need. People I know who have $250k in cash or cash like assets generally keep it in a mix of dollars, euros (one paranoid guy I know has a bunch of Canadian dollars - no idea why), junk silver, gold / silver bars (for the former, you're talking about $150k just for a 1kg bar), a collection of watches that appreciate in value, and so on. To quote one guy, "I want to make sure we can wear my family's wealth", which they indeed did (for no good reason, they're just from a cultural background that leads to them being paranoid about banks) when they moved from Scandinavia to Australia - watches, gold bars, etc. on them and their children's persons, valued easily north of $300k in current money.