| ▲ | Onavo a day ago |
| main vs master |
|
| ▲ | wiether a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| The issue has always been with the reasons invoked to make the change Otherwise it would have been smoother |
| |
| ▲ | happymellon a day ago | parent [-] | | You didn't hear the foaming at the mouth shouting to rename master recordings, master documents, or dub over The Master from Dr. Who. Considering how much effort we had to out into fixing pipelines because of hardcoded scripts, and the lack of good reason to do it its no surprise that it was scoffed at. White keyboard warriors needed to make a change, but couldn't do anything meaningful as it would require actually doing something. At least this change makes sense. | | |
| ▲ | fartcoin67 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | ChocolateGod a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I thought the purpose of the rename was to encourage these contributions that apparently weren't happening because of the branch name? It certainly helped GNOME whom was one of the biggest proponents /s | | |
| ▲ | chadgpt3 a day ago | parent [-] | | The purpose was to make some people feel righteous, which is the purpose of so much human activity. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | inigyou a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| personally my default branch is called dominatrix, just to annoy the kind of person who argues about master |
| |
|
| ▲ | otikik a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| mainster |
|
| ▲ | QuercusMax a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| ugh, half the repos at work use main and half use master. Such a pain. |
| |
