| ▲ | stevenhubertron a day ago | |
No one has really talked about hybrid and using Opus to plan and orchestrate GLMs work both through initial build and code reviews. That’s a true best of both worlds and there doesn’t need to be a winner. | ||
| ▲ | 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | jeremyjh a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is the way but Anthropic doesn’t make it easy, so I use GPT 5.5 in that role since I can use my subscription in OpenCode or OMP. I also use MiniMax-M3 in utility roles like explore/library tasks. I’ve had a z.ai subscription for several months so I’m on the older pricing. I’m really not sure it would make sense to do this at current rates - I could bump my Codex plan instead. | ||
| ▲ | mattew a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I mostly use Opus for skill development. Once I have a solid skill implementation with a good eval, I move ongoing execution to a cheaper model running under Goose. With the eval you can see if the cheaper model works well enough. | ||