> Surely, nationwide daily protests would make elected officials reconsider their positions, given an upcoming midterm election, while there still is one.

Hah. When was the last time a non-violent protest yielded some kind of result by itself? Certainly never in american history.

Anyway, there are daily protests. They just aren't covered by the media. Hell, the protests for palestine never stopped... the media just never wanted to cover them.

▲

t-3 an hour ago | parent [-]

Women's suffrage was relatively nonviolent.

▲

trollbridge 18 minutes ago | parent [-]

As was the civil rights era. The people who chose to be violent made it take longer, actually.

	▲	t-3 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I don't think that's really accurate. Without the perceived threat from the militant factions, the peaceful protesters wouldn't necessarily have had political backing and support. Peaceful movements had been suppressed until that point, after all.