| ▲ | jameswhitford a day ago | |||||||
Hi, I am the author, I completely agree! I set out to run a vibe test on this one, not a benchmark, the real benchmarks are listed. My test shows what the models can do when both tasked with a long-running, technically difficult, one-shot task. I think your test you describe (collaborative, task delegation, task completion, TTD, steerability) is a great format for a future test that I will definitely try out. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wongarsu a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Tbf, most of the "real benchmarks" have issues that are just as bad. Assessing LLM performance is just hard | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | meander_water a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Thanks, I didn't mean to be brusque, but I have seen a lot of these vibe tests lately that come to grand conclusions like "X model is better than Y" from the result of a single prompt. Appreciate you sharing the results of your tests though! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ramraj07 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The important point is that your benchmark is pretty much irrelevant for the actual usage. Thus whatever conclusion you draw is not just irrelevant but misleading. | ||||||||