| ▲ | cpursley 2 hours ago |
| With all the issues in the US and generally wrong direction, I can’t remember them ever arresting people for mean tweets in the way that Germany and the UK have. They all seem to be running full speed towards a surveillance state. |
|
| ▲ | lmm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > With all the issues in the US and generally wrong direction, I can’t remember them ever arresting people for mean tweets in the way that Germany and the UK have. Then you haven't been paying attention. The constitution prevents citizens from being convicted, but that doesn't stop arrests or being turned away at the border (even for permanent residents who've lived in the US for decades), and US citizens don't seem to care, so it's cold comfort for many of us. |
| |
| ▲ | leptons an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | >and US citizens don't seem to care I think maybe you haven't been paying attention. Most of us do care. Trump's approval rating is pretty low at 36%, and his disapproval rating is high. Just because he's still causing chaos doesn't mean the majority of us don't care about it. There's just no legal way to remove him, and his cronies simply won't do it - there's not enough votes in congress or he would have been gone after his first or second impeachment. https://www.npr.org/2026/06/20/nx-s1-5861764/trumps-job-appr... | | |
| ▲ | lysium an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I understand your point, however I don’t buy „there's just no legal way to remove him“. With so low ratings where are the daily protests against such type of government? Surely, nationwide daily protests would make elected officials reconsider their positions, given an upcoming midterm election, while there still is one. Don’t get me wrong, I know the thousands reasons why you won’t join a protest, I’m „guilty“ myself. I just want to argue against your argument that I quoted because this puts all of us in an unhelpful victim mentality. | | |
| ▲ | rob74 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Then again, nationwide daily protests would give the Trump administration an excuse to send ICE / the army / whoever else they can send to the cities where the protests take place (I guess they would be mostly blue-leaning ones) to "restore order", and at the same time lay the groundwork for influencing the November elections. But the turnout at the periodic nationwide "No Kings" protests has been very good, and they have fortunately stayed peaceful. |
| |
| ▲ | lmm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This isn't about Trump. No 4th amendment rights at the border has been an issue for at least 20 years, but US citizens don't care because it doesn't affect citizens. | | |
| ▲ | zingar 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yep, this was an issue long before Trump. They’ve just amped up the scale and stopped bothering with the deceit that they know doesn’t bother Americans. |
| |
| ▲ | PoignardAzur 20 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | A 36% approval rating is sky-high for a president that started a pointless immensely costly war after getting elected on a platform of "no more costly wars" and is in the process of negotiating an immensely unfavorable deal with Iran after getting elected on a platform of "Obama's deal with Iran was terrible, I could do much better". By contrast, Biden at the same point in his term was hovering around 39%, for the heinous crime of... rebuilding the US economy? Including some woke riders in his infrastructure bill? At this point, a fair assessment of US citizens is that on average, they seem to consider that being a right-wing autocrat wannabe, threatening to invade allied countries "as a negotiating tactic", being a climate change denier, starting a humiliating failed war, trying to blackmail the press into compliance, etc, are about 3% worse than being a cringe center-left bureaucrat. "US citizens don't seem to care" is an apt hyperbole. |
| |
| ▲ | cpursley 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are talking about something different (in bad faith). Please share a single instance of a US citizen being arrested for an offensive social media post. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | delis-thumbs-7e 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [x] Doesn’t know UK not in EU
[x] Thinks people inciting violence online a free speech -issue
[x] Calls Germany a surveillance state when US uses Palantir - a US company - to openly spy on its citizens X seems to work great. Inciting men in with gambling, porn, crypto, ai and other broistan staples, then feeding them far-right nonsense info points. |
|
| ▲ | rob74 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| By "mean tweets" I assume you mean death threats? How about not threatening to kill someone on social media, is that so hard to do? |
|
| ▲ | Latty 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They literally arrested people for quoting Charlie Kirk in tweets after his death. |
| |
|
| ▲ | solumunus 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That’s not the EU. |
