> This would be a great point if I had introduced either the NFT/crypto comparison OR the "existential threat" parameters, but if you read through the thread, you introduced both.

To quote you, ten minutes before:

> that the apocalypse is coming and your jobs are gone and everything is going to be shitty because a bunch of ultra rich midwits want even more money and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

It's a fair description of your stance. And, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

* intentionally cut off the "being told constantly" to lie by omission and hide the fact it's a complaint about a narrative rather than levying accusations of the thing itself

* fails to identify where "crypto scams" or "existential threat" was introduced, which was the entire point

* tells the other person what their own stance actually is

* fedora tipping edgelord sign-off line

Holy fuck I have just been absolutely obliterated in the marketplace of ideas. I concede. Please no more.