Unfortunately, in the car size arms race, bigger and heavier cars are safer for their occupants.

"Everyone outside the car be damned" is the expressed preference of US buyers.

They're only "safer" to the driver. Large vehicles put everyone else at a higher risk.

This is "race to the bottom" logic. The only end to this logic is everyone driving giant vehicles in bubbles because "it's safer for meeeeeeeee" as they hit children in a school zone cuz the blind spot in their Ford fuck550 is a football field long.

Race to the bottom logic is rampant in this form of capitalism that we're experiencing. Everyone's excuse is valid and only shifts the baseline to more excess and extreme behavior.

	▲	cindyllm 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

Eddy_Viscosity2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't think the US consumers are buying the bigger SUV/trucks because they are safer. At best it might be a minor contributing factor. It's primarily a status/identity thing.

▲

toomuchtodo 4 hours ago | parent [-]

n=1, I dated a low empathy woman who specifically drove a Chevy Tahoe due to mass for safety reasons and transporting her only child in the vehicle frequently. “Good luck to the other driver.”

▲

defrost 4 hours ago | parent [-]

On the flip side, there's a lot to be said for a low centre of gravity and it's still the case that US "trucks" get smushed by actual trucks (road trains and heavy haul outmass a tahoe).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TskUzmg6Sk

(Site safety video, engine and transmission removed in example vehicle .. still ..)

	▲	toomuchtodo 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Great video. She was sophisticated enough to understand the risk profile, anecdote shared to demonstrate that some folks do decision their purchase around winning the potential tonnage battle. Very “tragedy of the commons” that can only be solved with regulation. Otherwise, some will buy big because they can.