| ▲ | simianwords 9 hours ago | |
Interesting comment because there are some companies that have a different model where SREs take on call for code that SWEs write. How do they work? | ||
| ▲ | bravetraveler 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The SWEs get called too, particularly if SRE isn't able to untangle timely. Don't want to be called? Don't make incidents. Healthy orgs, as a peer comment points out, avoid too much separation between the positions. Things like change review are supposed to avoid this, but often gets rubber-stamped for 'velocity' (into a wall). | ||
| ▲ | hilariously 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
When they "work" instead of "make a giant fucking mess" its because SWEs take shifts as SREs and the distinction is more about time in the mines and less about distinct job functions. | ||
| ▲ | Balinares 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
In the original implementation, SREs have the authority to block further releases until the SLOs are green again -- and, if it comes to that, to hand the pager back to SWE until such a time the product can pass a production readiness review again. That requires a lot of trust on both sides, though, the building of which takes both time and deliberate effort, and I don't know how other shops do it. | ||