I agree with this. What was certain and predictable was that Harris was a war candidate (the Democrats presided over the first year of genocide and were intending to continue).

MAGA was going to be bad in some way, but the Democrats were very bad in very known ways, so voting for whoever was at least saying they were against war was the rational decision for anyone who cared about not having genociders at the helm of the state.

▲

inigyou 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Both Harris and Trump were identical in that respect, so it shouldn't have swayed your decision.

	▲	kelipso 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Harris was a known to be bad with respect to the war issue, became very obviously bad when she started campaigning with Liz Cheney. Trump was less known bad, so that difference should certainly have swayed your decision.

▲

krapp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>MAGA was going to be bad in some way, but the Democrats were very bad in very known ways, so voting for whoever was at least saying they were against war was the rational decision for anyone who cared about not having genociders at the helm of the state.

This implies that Donald Trump/Republicans weren't pro-Zionist and didn't support Israel which is obviously untrue.

The truth is there was no "non-genocide" candidate between the two parties and pretending otherwise - particularly by voting for Trump - was simply self-delusion.

	▲	throw37842 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Both sides are against the genocide of Israel, thank God - and against the genocide of Arabs. (Unlike the meme-puppets who now believe that some genocides are better than other genocides).