| ▲ | rvz 3 hours ago | |
> Before coding agents, when given a task, I would explore the codebase, think of different solutions, experiment, and only then implement. That could take days of consolidating all that context. When I finally submitted that PR, confidence was higher, and explaining each of my changes to my coworkers was easier. Now we are getting to the point where we are speed-running the deskilling of engineers into comprehension debt and they themselves rapidly losing confidence in reviewing code they did not write. I think this blog post [0] is the best example of what could go entirely wrong and even worse when you do not know the technology. If you cannot explain a change even when "the CI is green" or "all tests passing", I will immediately reject it. Maybe great for vibe coding prototypes, but it all changes when that code is deployed onto mission critical systems. Just ask Amazon with Kiro. [1] [0] https://sketch.dev/blog/our-first-outage-from-llm-written-co... [1] https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/amazons-clo... | ||